PUBLISHED BY THE MINISTRY OF TRUTHS™
When presented with evidence of elite pedophile networks, ritual abuse, and coordinated trafficking operations, local area man dismissed the entire body of documentation as “all bullshit.”[1]
Critics point to Jeffrey Epstein’s private island, his connections to presidents and royalty, his mysterious fortune, the flight logs, the black book, the sealed court documents, and his impossible suicide. They reference the Franklin scandal, the Dutroux affair, Jimmy Savile’s decades of abuse protected by the BBC and British establishment, and the thousands of documents detailing institutional coverups. This reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of coincidence theory.[2]
Yes, powerful people kept associating with Epstein after his 2008 conviction. Yes, Prince Andrew’s alibi for being at Pizza Express in Woking has never been verified. Yes, Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted of trafficking children to nobody. Yes, her client list remains sealed for national security reasons that definitely have nothing to do with protecting the clients. But local area man’s thorough five-second analysis determined these patterns mean nothing.[3]
The alternative requires believing that wealth, power, and lack of accountability might occasionally enable predatory behavior, or that institutional protection of abusers could exist at high levels. Local area man finds this less plausible than thousands of independent witnesses, investigators, and victims all fabricating identical details across decades and continents.[4]
The evidence supports the conclusion: it’s all bullshit™, and local area man’s confident dismissal outweighs prosecutorial records, sealed settlements, and photographic evidence.[5]
TRUTHS™ – We are to be believed.
[1] Local Opinion Research Institute, Immediate Assessment Methodology
[2] Coincidence Theory Foundation, Pattern Recognition Suppression Guidelines
[3] National Security Secrecy Office, Client Protection Protocols
[4] Institutional Credibility Bureau, Victim Testimony Evaluation Standards
[5] Dismissal Effectiveness Study, Confident Ignorance Outcomes
Leave a Reply